Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The argument is based on assamptions only and there is not any proof in the argument to support that Paleo diets can cure chronic illnesses.
To start with, human ancestors were living centuries ago! Different way of leaving. We can be sure that they didn't have the luxariy of today just by going to a supermarket to get food and that's all. They have to hunt in difficult cercumnstances and there was not an alternative way. Thus, cooking animal bones may be a way of survival.
Moreover, the argument assume that if we emulate the way they ate we can cure many chronic illnesses. What if by eating bone broth or a soup made by animal bones is the reason behind some illnesses we have today? For example, the most resent one, COVID-19. It's been said that the virus outbreak origins by cooking a bat.
Furtheremore, the argument state that is a anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. There is no proof on that or any statistical number or any experiment at least to show this is true. Maybe this is true but by making assumtions does not mean we are correct.
To conclude, just by a statment that says Paleo diets will be more beneficial than what we eat today does not mean that it will cure many chronic illnesses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Ruhani | 59 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 70 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Akash Konar | 55 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | fabjaved | 62 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | hello_kratnesh101 | 47 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 47
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 60
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 52
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 235 350
No. of Characters: 1043 1500
No. of Different Words: 138 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.915 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.438 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.453 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 57 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 45 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.077 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.915 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.538 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.323 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.596 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.132 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ay of leaving. We can be sure that they didnt have the luxariy of today just by going...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... going to a supermarket to get food and thats all. They have to hunt in difficult cer...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...urtheremore, the argument state that is a anecdotal evidence that people who cons...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, at least, for example, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 55.5748502994 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 2260.96107784 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 233.0 441.139720559 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63948497854 5.12650576532 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.56307096286 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52632623146 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 204.123752495 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579399141631 0.468620217663 124% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 705.55239521 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9341329601 57.8364921388 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1538461538 119.503703932 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9230769231 23.324526521 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 5.70786347227 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172875546062 0.218282227539 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599292393789 0.0743258471296 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624636949294 0.0701772020484 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882151473501 0.128457276422 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547544707492 0.0628817314937 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 14.3799401198 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.3550499002 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.197005988 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.5979740519 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 98.500998004 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.