Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try snd improve such situations.
Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
A bad situation can be roughly defined as a scenario in which people are to endure discomfort. Responses to such situations have long been a heated debate among the general public. Some people claim that the number on solution is to accpt your fate, whereas others insist on revolutionising. From my perspective, I am more inclined towards the latter for the reasons further discussed below.
One of the most important reason is that withstanding dissactisfaction can have long-term effects on mentality. A dillema can vary greatly from trivia things like the summer heat to essential issues in one's life like his or her marriage. Numerous studies have shown that even the simplest discomfort can have an unforeseeable negative impact on our feelings, allowing to people embrace anger, sadness more easily, which in turn results in life-long pessimistc outlook on life. Not encompassing optimism undoubtedly means people are much more prone to mental illnesses, for instance depression.
Another point is something many people occasionally take for granted: their ability. We can never fully acknowledge our ability lest we go to great lengths nor can we recognise our limit lest we strongly push ourselves forward. It is undeniable that some questions are really hard to find a proper answer to, but it does not equalise impossibility. Therefore, if you were to be complacent with whatever life throws at you, your life will never be as what you have anticipated.
Opponents may argue that through measures of prediction, they can be sure of the fact that things may slip out of their control when fighting for themselves. That viewpoint has its own merits, yet to a surface level. It is worth bearing in mind that fighting for their own rights does not only revolve around the awful possibility of future but more important, the say-no-to-regret present.
The discussion above has highlighted the shortcoming in the opposing view and at the same time sheds light on the validity of its counterpart. Therefore, it is advised that for its positive spirits and impacts on mental health, nobody should go along with obstacles, but rather overcome them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-09 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-23 | hau le | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ave long been a heated debate among the general public. Some people claim that the number on s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... the summer heat to essential issues in ones life like his or her marriage. Numerous...
^^^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peopling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: peopling
...gative impact on our feelings, allowing to people embrace anger, sadness more easily, whi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, really, so, therefore, whereas, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16239316239 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90603597516 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649572649573 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9908293986 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.588235294 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76470588235 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114074408679 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375121470593 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403986456981 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642811241447 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668761324531 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.