Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed
Educational institutions are an integral part of everyone’s life not particularly when one is persuading a subject or degree but also when one’s children are the one doing so. In one way or other one is somehow linked to it. As a part of our life where we tend to spend the most of our time, choosing a subject which later turns to a career is crucial where these institutions plays a vital role in finding the best subject for us. The claim thus made by the prompt regarding the role of educational institution can be partially agreed with the following supportive statements.
First of all, educational institutes especially, teachers and professors are the one who deliberately understand the extent of one’s interest towards any subject. For example, if someone is good at mathematics but instead he/she desires t pursue to take subject with job security like engineering or else, the prime responsible personnel to make them understand the values of interest are these education promoters. One cannot say whether he/she will succeed or not but one must persuade them to go after something they are good with.
Secondly, to find one’s interest is a tough job, however, once such interest is not clearly seen by the bearer but through their complementary characters. For example, the famous cricket Sachin Tendulkar wanted to be an actor, started off with his acting class with excelling cricket skills. His sport teacher, once made him realize the extent of his talent in acting and in sporting, that moment proved to be a game changing point not for himself but the history of cricket itself. Similarly, the legendary singer Lata Mangeshkar, whose melodious voice not only soothes the ears and soul but also transcends time and sufferings, once dreamed of being an actress. A simple realization about the field where one can excel is much aiding then a whole lecture about persuading what other desires. No one can averts she could not have succeed if she started off her acting career but her extreme talent of singing would have gone unnoticed.
Finally, persuasion of any subject should not be judged on the basis of likelihood of success. One who is poor at chemistry in high school cannot be discouraged to take on the subject just because his grades are low. For example, the genius; Albert Einstein was no more than a struggler in his school days, who was constantly criticized for his poor performance and skills. His teachers were bleak about him. They just saw a complete useless fellow who can doing but live just like the rest of the world does; they could barely see the subtle art which was always within him. The same guy even in today’s time holds the title of being genius and one of the greatest brains in the history of science.
To sum up, educational institute does play a vital role in understanding the profound being and existence but dissuading subject on the basis of success rate is completely vague statement to put forth. The talent and boundary one’s brain has no limit and one should always believe with the fact that anything can be done with complete passion and dedication.
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another 83
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making 83
- In an attempt to improve highway safety Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways But this effort has failed the number of accidents has not decreased and based on reports by the highway patrol man 59
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 83
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne is somehow linked to it. As a part of our life where we tend to spend the most...
^^
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which later turns to a career is crucial where these institutions plays a vital r...
^^
Line 3, column 805, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'avert'
Suggestion: avert
...rsuading what other desires. No one can averts she could not have succeed if she start...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 831, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'succeeded'.
Suggestion: succeeded
...s. No one can averts she could not have succeed if she started off her acting career bu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, thus, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2598.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 533.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87429643527 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62541917411 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 815.4 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9899337154 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.714285714 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.380952381 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114909584819 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321757200794 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359370717251 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665944981274 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279560659235 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne is somehow linked to it. As a part of our life where we tend to spend the most...
^^
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which later turns to a career is crucial where these institutions plays a vital r...
^^
Line 3, column 805, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'avert'
Suggestion: avert
...rsuading what other desires. No one can averts she could not have succeed if she start...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 831, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'succeeded'.
Suggestion: succeeded
...s. No one can averts she could not have succeed if she started off her acting career bu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, thus, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2598.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 533.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87429643527 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62541917411 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 815.4 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9899337154 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.714285714 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.380952381 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114909584819 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321757200794 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359370717251 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665944981274 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279560659235 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.