Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking?
These days, the number of pedestrians on the streets has significantly declined due to several reasons. Therefore, there are some possible solutions to change this situation that I will mention in this essay.
There are two primary reasons why fewer people walk every single day. Firstly, manifold modern types of transport have been invented such as cars, trains, motorbikes. Obviously, these vehicles would be more effective and beneficial for people since they are faster compared to walking and can prevent commuters from extreme weather. Another reason is that walking might be unsafe because there are no pavements or just small ones on the streets. Also, in some developing countries, like Vietnam or Indonesia for example, dwellers are taking over the sidewalks for their personal purposes.
However, measures must be taken to tackle this problem. One solution would be for the governments to invest in building larger pavements and replacing the degraded ones. Furthermore, the governs should impose regulations on people using the sidewalks illegally. Last but not least, it is necessary for companies to encourage employees going yo work on foot by having a special strategy like easing restrictions on working hours.
In conclusion, by the act of the authority, the problem that fewer people walk can be solved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-20 | ililmaidatuz | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | ililmaidatuz | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-02 | maiduc | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | queanh | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | queanh | 78 | view |
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 78
- Oil production capacity 78
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010 85
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002 100
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 209.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37799043062 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6945998905 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.712918660287 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6916358654 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4166666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183730349239 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665168887465 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921820255764 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11423656931 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994926426091 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.