The maps show the change of an office building between the present and the future. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate the future development of an office building comparing to its present layout.
Overall, it can be seen that more zones will be indicated for officers and the two grasslands will be used mostly for people to sit and meet.
Looking at the existing layout, as you walk in the entrance, the first thing you see is the bathroom in front of the stockroom. While the hall is divided into two parts by a corridor, there are four offices on the left with the kitchen, canteen, and stockroom in the opposite. It is also noticed that the two outside grass areas located at the West and the East of this building and there is another entrance on the West where staff can enter through.
As the future plan proposed, the enormous difference will take place in this building. Firstly, the main entrance is intended to be relocated to the middle of two office rooms in the South of the building, facing the other two office rooms which are the replacement of the old kitchen and canteen. The night hand side grass area will be converted into an inside meeting area with a coffee machine and the toilet will be moved in this newly built enclosure. The left-hand side grass area will now have seating added in order to create an outdoor activity area for the staff.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-14 | minhngoc_8 | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | lucluc | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | Shiro | 77 | view |
| 2022-11-01 | myduyen282 | 67 | view |
- The pie charts provided illustrate two major changes in the use of modes of transport to a certain university between 2004 and 2009 90
- The diagram below shows the process of making olive oil
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 80
- The diagram shows how electricity is generated by a hydroelectric dam Write a 150 word report for a university lecturer explaining how the process works 78
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61403508772 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31354556359 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570175438596 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4447831963 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.888888889 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117400911346 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587867960225 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761881674403 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101181519512 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974647662111 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61403508772 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31354556359 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570175438596 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4447831963 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.888888889 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117400911346 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587867960225 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761881674403 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101181519512 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974647662111 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.