The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart illustrates the causes of degradation of agricultural lands all over the world. The table gives information on the impact of these causes to the 3 regions of the world such as USA, Europe and Oceania in 1990’s and unit is being measured by percentile.
Overall, four major reasons are being compared why lands became less productive and the highest percentage goes to over-grazing which greatly affects Oceania. This was being followed by deforestation in which Europe was the mostly affected one.
Degradation of the agricultural soil in 1990’s was caused by grazing which shows 35% out of 100% while cutting of trees was the second reason and has 30%. Over- cultivation plays a part in 28%.
Europe was the mostly affected region and became the most degraded land which got 23% loss in all the mentioned causes of degradation. However, North America seems to be the least affected one as it only has 5% loss in its land productivity.
- Some people say that the education system is the only critical factor to the development of a country To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of for different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: IN_1990s[2]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990’s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990’s
...e world such as USA, Europe and Oceania in 1990’s and unit is being measured by percentil...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eing measured by percentile. Overall, four major reasons are being compared wh...
^^
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: IN_1990s[2]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990’s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990’s
.... Degradation of the agricultural soil in 1990’s was caused by grazing which shows 35% o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94444444444 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73328565651 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8135492572 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257051080616 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107048773286 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728348354464 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150656325438 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059452682095 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.