Antarctica warming

Essay topics:

Antarctica warming

There has been a debate about whether or not Antarctica was as much as 100 c warmer. In the reading the author states three theories to support its claims. However, in the listening the professor casts doubt each claims made in the reading. He believes that none of these theories is convincing.
First of all, the writer mentions that the evidence of pollen grains might prove that Antarctica 15 million years ago was warm enough to ensure plants to grow normally. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. She states pollen grains were light enough to be carried by wind to thousands of kilometres away; therefore, the pollen grains could be produced by the plants from nearby places, like, South America and New Zealand, and traveled into the Antarctica with wind of ocean water.
Secondly, the author assorts that the level of the climbing of CO2 might be caused by the confirmed major volcanic activity during the Middle Miocene, and CO2 is linked to climate warming. The professor, however, refutes this point by mentioning the fact that the recent research shows that the CO2 level was much lower than it is today. Thus, the Antarctica is million years ago might not undergo the climate warming.
Finally, the author claims that deuterium and increase rainfall might have something to do with high temperature in Antarctica. The professor casts doubt on this weak argument. According to her, different plants have various capacity of absorbing the deuterium; therefore, it is possible that certain types of plant in Antarctica might have the ability to absorb the large amount of deuterium. In this way, the amount of deuterium could indicate the increased rainfall not to mention the climate warming

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-16 degew59415@eryod.com 3 view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle 85 view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle 78 view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle 83 view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
There has been a debate about whether or not Antarctica was as much as 100 c warmer....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...an it is today. Thus, the Antarctica is million years ago might not undergo the climate...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04225352113 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48795949962 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556338028169 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9797410736 49.2860985944 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211179741299 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633209591463 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722229975909 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114535651923 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525774977287 0.0443174109184 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.