All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Will the companies operate more efficiently when they listen to their own employees or when companies hire outside consultants?
Some argue that hiring a consultant from outside of the company would promote the operation of the company because the consultants are considered to be experts in that particular field. But others state that companies operating system would improve when they pay more attention to the suggestions of their own employees.
After weighing the evidence, it is certain that the companies would operate more efficiently when the employees are involved rather than hiring outside consultants because employees understand the core values of the companies and have a practical experience of the loopholes of the companies that they work for therefore, the employees are in best position to offer suggestions on moving the companies forward.
Those who would argue that consultants should be hired from outside fail to realize that these consultants are novice to the companies and would only understand the visions of the companies based on what they are told and that would give them a myopic view of what the companies stands to achieve unless they have a more practical experience like employees.
Now consider that Microsoft which is one of the leading technology companies in the world sends his employees to tech schools for three to six months to acquire further knowledge on new innovations in the tech world in order to improve the company rather than spending the money on hiring consultants from outside that keep charging them each time they render their services to the company.
In a long run, Microsoft would spend less and gain more when its their own employees rendering such services and these employees would focus more on the improvement of the company rather the money been paid.
Like Guaranty Trust bank that has become a leading bank in Nigeria because of their innovation of mobile banking which was suggested by some of their employees who noticed where other banks were failing.
In conclusion, it is clear that companies would operate more efficiently when they spend quality time in listening to their own employees and also, acting on their suggestions rather than hiring outside consultants.
- Vitamin A deficiency 50
- Emotions and logic 50
- Emotions and logic 50
- Unmanned space flight 43
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 341, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
...y work for therefore, the employees are in best position to offer suggestions on moving...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...oft would spend less and gain more when its their own employees rendering such serv...
^^^
Line 11, column 21, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Trust) must be used with a third-person verb: 'banks'.
Suggestion: banks
...money been paid. Like Guaranty Trust bank that has become a leading bank in Niger...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22865013774 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64908657698 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446280991736 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 572.4 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 23.0359550562 174% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.571504719 60.3974514979 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 210.888888889 118.986275619 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.3333333333 23.4991977007 172% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.586394647433 0.243740707755 241% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.31132990447 0.0831039109588 375% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119277065141 0.0758088955206 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327626327791 0.150359130593 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131531897437 0.0667264976115 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.4 14.1392134831 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.88 48.8420337079 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 12.1743820225 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 11.2143820225 161% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.