Unmanned space flight
The following arguments is flawed for numerous reasons. Primarily, the argument is based on the assumption that unmanned space flight is cheap and less risky, rendering its main conclusion, that resources should be invested in unmanned space flight, invalid.
The argument fails to provide any justification that can explain the discoveries that unmanned space flight has brought to the world to aid better technology. For one, there are various discoveries that has been demontrated by manned space flight which has been beneficial to the world. More significantly, the argument states that a great deal of useful information has been gathered by unmanned space flight. If manned space flight has also provided similar kind of useful information, then the argument is baseless. Had the argument provided information regarding the levels of efficiency of those useful information gathered by both manned and unmanned space flight when implemented then the argument could have been valid.
Finally, The argument also leaves other unanswered questions.Even if manned space flight is considered costly, the cost of setting up or a robot or equipment for unmanned space flight could also be expensive when estimated due to availability of materials, trials and researches that would be carried out before the equipment can be used and it could also cause danger to the health of the researchers.
Because the argument makes several unwarranted assumptions, it fails to make a convincing case that unmanned space flight will mirror the success rate exhibited by manned space flight in time past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Krisha Lakhani | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | riyarmy | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | BusariMoruf | 55 | view |
- Emotions and logic 50
- Emotions and logic 50
- Unmanned space flight 43
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- Vitamin A deficiency 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 15
No. of Words: 250 350
No. of Characters: 1318 1500
No. of Different Words: 132 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.976 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.272 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.72 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 71 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.778 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.662 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.509 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.725 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.241 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Even
... also leaves other unanswered questions.Even if manned space flight is considered co...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, regarding, so, then, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 249.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43373493976 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85000814219 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.1845374764 60.3974514979 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.333333333 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.243740707755 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0831039109588 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150359130593 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.