Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
It is essential for the nation to preserve their cultural traditions, as it defines a lifestyle for the future generation. However, I contend with the statement that the Government should provide financial support to major cities as they preserve the national culture and are the origins of it. Major cities are not the only places where the nation's cultural traditions are preserved, town, villages play a similar role in preserving the traditional values.
In the nation, major cities, due to more amenities and opportunities, attract foreigners. Also, people from different parts of the nation like to live in major cities as it provides more job opportunities and business arguments. And hence, this is the reason, major cities always represent the amalgamation of different cultures. And as most of the residents of the major cities have common interests: business, job, career, it always leads to the professional culture, and thus, it diminishes the traditional culture of the nation.
On the other hand, villages and towns of the nation are the true forfeits of the traditional cultures. Major cities always represent a demanding lifestyle for the development of the country. So people in their old age living in the cities like to emigrate back to the villages and their hometown as they find a peaceful lifestyle and their true culture is preserved there.
Some may argue that as major cities are the places where all the people from the country lives it will generate new culture. So, it is necessary to provide financial support to major cities to preserve it. I agree with it, but again this does not provide any evidence that how funds would help to preserve traditional values in the major cities.
In sum, I disagree with the statement that the government should provide financial support to major cities as cities preserve and generate national culture. Villages, towns, and small cities are in a true way to preserve the culture and play a similar role in generating the culture.
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 66
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition 66
- the following appeared as a letter to the editor of a national newspaper Your recent article on corporate downsizing in Elthyria maintains that the majority of competent workers who have lost jobs as a result of downsizing face serious economic hardship o 55
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 50
- Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive Reason It is primarily in cities that a nation s cultural traditions are preserved and generated 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mammals'' or 'mammal's'?
Suggestion: mammals'; mammal's
...r extinction. Another reason for the mammals extinction can be the humans excessive ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 55.5748502994 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 2260.96107784 65% => OK
No of words: 293.0 441.139720559 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98976109215 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66552245523 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 204.123752495 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440273037543 0.468620217663 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 705.55239521 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2985133637 57.8364921388 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.428571429 119.503703932 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 5.70786347227 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21363365083 0.218282227539 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813541134195 0.0743258471296 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057138569132 0.0701772020484 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111335791436 0.128457276422 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667911664893 0.0628817314937 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.3799401198 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.5979740519 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 98.500998004 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.