Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.
Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.
Planning to take courses should be left to students. Students must get freedom to choose their subjects as per their interest. Course planning which take into account suggestions from students are bound to result in effective curricula.
First of all, students who are passionate for a particular field should get right direction and help. Courses that interest them will eventually lead to good job prospects. It depends on student dedication and resources which influence them to reach their goal. For example, student who is interested in developing music must be educated in that field. One of the most important factors is how forcefully the student works every single day. Working trivially can eventually to a positive review.
Second of all, if a student is forced to take subjects that doesn’t interest will be mournful the entire life. For example, a student is forced by his parents to take science related courses. Even after the completion of degree and securing a reputed job in IT sector will be depressed in the end. In sum, parents are an important factor that can influence or shape a child’s career.
However, it is students responsibilities to cover for his family after all. Being vehement about their interest and following them is one thing and getting back success doesn’t belong in their hands. After a point, student must realize and go along with a principled job to feed his family. In this competitive world, there are transmute opportunities to be fortunate. Leading a job in the future should be as a backup.
In conclusion, students must follow their dreams and passion but always have a backup if they aren’t anywhere. Believing in ourselves should be adequate to reach beyond our boundaries.
- the first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar 58
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of an action are more important than the inten 54
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition 50
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education 50
- Learning is primarily a matter of personal discipline students cannot be motivated by school or college alone 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, after all, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 286.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74136577499 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56993006993 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.4071066053 60.3974514979 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.8 118.986275619 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3 23.4991977007 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290084170075 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875928284576 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685671323898 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177049576414 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921884242295 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.