Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In today’s world, sports have been watched more than before and because of their popularity, much amount of money have been paid to successful sports professionals. Although some people think they deserve this great deal of money, others think it is not justified for other people with diverse occupations. This essay is going to talk about the both of these opinions and also my opinion which concur with the group who has thought it as a fair issue.
First of all, this high payment case for famous athletes have pursued by many people whom are against it. In these people’s opinion earning much amount of money for sport professionals could be an inane task. Because everybody with various jobs have been working hard to get promoted or to build their life. So athletes who are not only the most popular people in the world, but also the richest ones, have not been doing anything specific. So consequently, it does not mean they could be paid more than others just because of their fame.
On the other hand, there are some individuals who have thought making much great deal of money for these well-known athletes are completely fair and wisely. The main significant reason why they think like that is the fact which those people will not able to be active like others in their late thirties. Those years have been essential and practical for other people to expand their business in order to be paid more. But sport professionals should be retired at those ages because their bodies has not has as much strength and power as the past. Moreover, in some occasions if some athletes have been hurt badly, they may have asked to leave their field in even younger age. Base on those reasons, some humans have believed sportspersons have right to earn a great deal of money in order to spend them in their near future. I myself totally agree with this group.
In conclusion, nowadays popular athletes have been paid more money than other people in different fields. This issue has some pros and cons. Both of these views have had several reasons for their thoughts which had been mentioned in this essay. And even though the agreements of this statement are less than the opposite ones, essay’s writer is one of them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-05 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | ngthanh1220@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-30 | hungdung2507 | 84 | view |
| 2022-04-10 | proshipper | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-12 | Hoàng Tiến Đạt | 89 | view |
- Using a computer every day can have more negative effects on young children Do you agree or disagree 73
- Topic the tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 84
- In some places young people find it difficult to communicate with older people Why is this What are the solutions 87
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- linear process 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77260981912 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2773552587 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9368812851 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2105263158 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3684210526 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307740672211 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106729507006 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895656800665 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228709665037 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834518215711 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.