The premise that people in power in any job should step down after five years does not always remain true. Nonetheless, I believe that people in power should be replaced by others after several years. Two points that come to my mind are inefficiencies and the hope of being in power in the future.
Firstly, in any profession, those in power may show some inefficiencies in their works. If they never replace with others who are more proficient, it would be arduous to eliminate inefficiencies and again boost the whole team; also, the team loses the opportunity of working with professional managers. It is common among managers that act such inefficiently after several years that members of the team have to work without the help of an adept manager. In such a situation, managers should be replaced to reclamation the whole team. For instance, when I was working in a research lab, my manager and his assistant after several months change their manner so that the improvement in efficiency; while it did not work and all projects were faced with the problems. Not only we did not have any opportunity to replace the manager also we were forced to finish projects without any efficient advice.
Secondly, without stepping down the people in power after several years other people cannot have this opportunity to improve in their works; also, they lose their hope of being as a manager in their profession. As a personal example, most students like me who are young wish to be a manager in their field. As all of them start their careers as an intern in companies they will lose their self-confidence and their hopes when they realize that they will never be a manager or a person in power. As a consequence, there would be no passion for improvement in the company due to the fixed positions.
Besides the above points I mentioned, we should emphasize that the replacement of people in power after a short time may not work in any profession. For instance, in government or politics, a president may need more than five years to pursue some plans and finishes them correctly. For instance, in our country, Iran, we had some cases in the past that presidents remained in their positions for around eight years to reach some of their goals. Hence, it needs to consider the importance of a job itself; also, the importance of the number of years for stepping down people in power.
To wrap up, I believe that it is better to step down people in power after several years, five years or more or less because people in power may show inefficiencies and they need to be replaced with adept ones; moreover, other people in that job should have this opportunity to improve and become one of the people in power in the future. However, this is not true for all profession and we should pay attention to the time of the period of the replacement.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful leaders should make others part of the decision making process 76
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 50
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7 000 years ago and within 3 000 years most ofthe large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had becomeextinct Y et humans cannot have been a factor in the species extinctions be 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After high school students should have at least oneyear to work or travel It s better than attendinguniversity straight away 66
- In any profession business politics education government those in power should step down after five years 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ever be a manager or a person in power. As a consequence, there would be no passio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, more or less, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2345.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6993987976 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64081269141 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.422845691383 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 743.4 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8271162588 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.421052632 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2631578947 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78947368421 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250771210463 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932963184126 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899730778314 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176600889833 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084560297186 0.0667264976115 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.