Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person. Do you think this is the best way to do it or are there better alternatives? What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion?
In many parts of the world, companies prefer to hire candidates through personal interviews. These interviews are often pre-planned and help employers to access the personality of the interviewee. Due to its worldwide acceptance, it is undoubtedly a good method to hire people. However, I believe that other ways like writing questionnaire before an interview can be a valuable process to choose employees.
To start with, job interviews have been conducted for several years, as many companies consider it as a reliable source of interviewing. This method often allows recruitment team to assess the knowledge and personal traits of an individual. Perhaps in many profession, communication skills are crucial, which can only be judged through such interviews. For instance, occupations related to service industries, where complaint handling is an important aspect of job role, the person ought to have a good command in his interaction skills. Thus, for many industries, these interviews serve their purpose by choosing suitable employees as per their requirements.
On the other hand, in my opinion, written assessment and an interview afterwards, could be the best method to hire suitable candidates. This is because written tests help employers to comprehend the skills of the candidate, which can not be achieved merely through personal interviews. For instance, professions related to engineering, where their technical skills are valued most in the hiring process; employers can have better outcomes from conducting these tests. Alternatively, in such professions, the technical questions during an interview is limited, and one can prepare in advance to have an upperhand in a job interview. Therefore, conducting written exams can not only filter best people but also saves time in hiring process.
In conclusion, although personal interviews are widely accepted because of their better comprehension of personal assessment. However, I believe, job interviews on the top of written tests can be the most suitable process to hire better candidates.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-16 | Shwatank | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-13 | pris | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | sahilrocks11 | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-28 | Anmol Thukral | 61 | view |
| 2020-04-28 | Anmol Thukral | 48 | view |
- Giving pocket money to children is very common in many countries To what extend do you agree and disagree 61
- The current trend in education is to move away from traditional exams and instead have continuous assessment over the school year What do you think of this trend Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or exp 78
- You and your classmate just received a poor grade on a major school project One reason for your grade was that your classmate s family member got very ill Your classmate was distracted and didn t contribute as much as was expected Write a letter to your p 73
- In many countries very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Y 94
- In many countries traditions and customs are disappearing What are the reasons What should schools and parents do to keeping our traditions alive 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun profession seems to be countable; consider using: 'many professions'.
Suggestion: many professions
...nal traits of an individual. Perhaps in many profession, communication skills are crucial, whic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59554140127 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10940416404 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535031847134 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9783728624 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.8125 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185327240688 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661592999603 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324829842943 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125723124663 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192025114392 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.