Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's sophisticated and progressive world where we live, no one can turn a blind eye to the significant effect of the perfect relationship on their lives. Contrary to the opinion of many people that people should find many new friends, while I firmly believe that it is useful for individuals to maintain friendships with a small number of people for a long time. In the following paragraphs, I will cogently explain my reasons to justify my viewpoint.
To begin with, If people maintain friendships for a long time, they will save energy and time. In other words, when they want to find new friends that they need to assign much time and energy to look for reliable friends and develop their relationship. Moreover, people need to talks and go out with different people, so they use a lot of energy and time. For instance, when I was a child, I had a lot of friends that knew each other at school. After I played with all of them, I was very tired. And, I didn't devote enough time to my lessons, so I got a bad score in lessons because I spend a lot of energy to play with my new friends. Hence, the more friends they have friends, the more energy and time they will spend.
Secondly, when they get into trouble, just old friends help them, and they can trust. To be more specific, life is full of unexpected emergencies which can cause a lot of anxiety, so people need reliable friends to help them to overcome any obstacles. For example, I can remember a time that I was a student in another city that I have a roommate. And, I got a disease and I didn't have enough money for living expenses, and I couldn't work. When I deal with these problems, he got the job and helped me to treat disease. Therefore, If people have reliable friends for a long time, they can trust them in crisis situations.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that is more beneficial and conducive for people to maintain friendships for a long time with a small number of people. People can maintain their friends, Not only save energy and time but also trust them when they got into trouble.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 83 | view |
2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
2023-07-11 | YasamanEsml | 81 | view |
2023-07-04 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
2023-06-01 | slliland | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 60
- 49 Tpo 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ndividuals to maintain friendships with a small number of people for a long time. In the followin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'talk'.
Suggestion: talk
... relationship. Moreover, people need to talks and go out with different people, so th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...h all of them, I was very tired. And, I didnt devote enough time to my lessons, so I ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... a roommate. And, I got a disease and I didnt have enough money for living expenses, ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...enough money for living expenses, and I couldnt work. When I deal with these problems, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...intain friendships for a long time with a small number of people. People can maintain their frien...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48548812665 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51850248282 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46437994723 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0074779156 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4444444444 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0555555556 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133815305101 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529030095074 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349733656757 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956172261333 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157805593773 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.