Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need
to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, global warming has been receiving a great deal of media
attention around the world due to its substantial impacts on human life.
Although the idea of coexistence between climate change and humans
appears reasonable, this cannot be viewed as the ultimate approach for
humankind to combat climate change.
There are a number of reasons why the coexistence can do more harm than
good. First, climate change is largely shaped by human-caused
geoengineering rather than nature itself. For example, in order to produce
the energy that drives the world’s economy, most nations rely on carbonrich fuels like coal, oil and gas, which directly correlates with the
intensification of global warming. Second, even if citizens agree to keep the
environment the way it is, corporations, especially in the manufacturing and
mining industries, would not as that would affect their profits. Therefore, it
can be implied that if corporations were not held accountable for their
contribution to global warming as in the case of coexistence, the issue of
climate change would inevitably be exacerbated.
It is more economically sound to actively prevent climate change than to
ignore it. In fact, the costs, either financial or non-financial, of dealing with
future consequences of climate change can be overwhelming. For instance,
the increase in intensity and frequency of storms can cause massive
destructions and deaths in many coastal areas, which would take decades
to recover. In addition, rising temperatures have also contributed to the
extinction of species worldwide. It should be noted that the extinction is
irreversible and comes at great cost to the ecosystem and apparently
humans living within it.
In conclusion, actively combating global warming must be regarded as top
priority given the high urgency. Governments and corporations worldwide
should take steps to ensure that climate change remains at bay.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Amarul Azmi | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | Nhun Nhun | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | bnhanh02 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-29 | Hangphan02 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think that people should have freedom to do any sports or activity Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- the chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 78
- Writing task 1 11
- Writing task 1 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58333333333 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04552677436 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623333333333 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5268206265 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.642857143 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 27.0 4.38176352705 616% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133083753983 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461097103219 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385344340751 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0344773437589 0.151304729494 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419114980786 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.