Do you prefer watching TV programs for knowledge or just for entertainmen
In our modern era that we encounter the lack of time to dedicate to boosting ourselves knowledge, in addition; by improving ourselves we are able to improve our level at work, by turning a blind eye to those who support or repudiate the contention, I lean towards the fact that it is both cost and time-effective for us to watch television in order to learn things instead of just entertainment. There are conspicuous reasons which will be elaborated as follows.
The first and foremost notion which I assert is that, due to our hectic lifestyle that we have just a few hours free for ourselves, it is authentically vital to dedicate our time on learning things and if we want to watch television it will a wise decision to watch the informative programs. These kinds of programs inform us of a variety of subjects. In addition, by developing our knowledge in our free time, we will able to promote our job because we have more information and knowledge about a variety of subjects. I have a personal example expanding on follows. About years ago, at my first job, I had lots of stuff to do and the work time was eight hours. When I came home after work I dedicate time to watching some useless programs on TV. One of my colleagues that hire at the same time as I just got a promotion, he said to me that he was spending his time on his thriving by watching practical programs in his free time. As soon as I started to watch particular programs boosting my experience and informing me, I got a promotion from the firm. To make a long story short it is a good and effective way to develop our knowledge of rages of subjects.
The layer reason that I insight is that watching profitable programs on television is cost-effective. Instead of going to lots of classes to develop our knowledge about a specific major, it is cost-effective to learn it from home through various practical programs that are free on television. Besides, we can reduce our transportation expenses due to the fact that we stay at home and we do not have to pay for communal transportation services in order to go to the class. Statistics show that people who are more self-learning from home and with free apps and programs through television have more untouched money at the end of the month and are able to spend them on their debts.
To make a long story short, watching utilitarian programs not only will flourish us but also it is cost and time effective for us. In the end, time is like a piece of gold we should not squander it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Thomas2028 | 76 | view |
| 2023-05-30 | Atharva_Bhide1808 | 70 | view |
- Some people think the media including newspapers televisions radio and internet sources are less concerned with the accuracy of news They think the information from the media is becoming incorrect Do you agree with this opinion or not and explain why Incl 66
- For schools assessing teachers teaching efficiency is a very important issue But is it better for other teachers to assess or let students assess teachers 76
- Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship because being away from people reminds us of how important they are Others think we should always stay with others to have good relationship because we can communicate with 71
- Do you prefer watching TV programs for knowledge or just for entertainmen 73
- The government can take a variety of actions to help protect the environment Which one of the following do you think is the most important for the nation s government to take to protect the environment 1 Fund the research to develop environmentally friend 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51868131868 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80883076207 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463736263736 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.4120973733 48.9658058833 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.941176471 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7647058824 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05882352941 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197812054364 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662441142057 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456746255886 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126416165335 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354809554723 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.