The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
The first pie chart describes the data regarding the amount of energy consumed by several activities in an Australian family, whereas the second illustrates the greenhouse gas exhausting because of such consumption.
Generally, Australian have a tendency to utilize generated power for heating (42%).
An average Australian household employs 30% of energy for boiling water. Refrigeration, lighting and cooling take up 7%, 4% and 2% of power respectively. Hence, cooling is the action required the least amount of energy.
The consumption of energy leads to emanate of greenhouse gas. According to the second chart, refrigeration and lighting emit 14% and 8% of effluvium although they consume only half of that number of energy. Water heating accounts for 32% of the total exhaust while heating is recorded to cause 15% of the emissions. Even though other appliances consumed only 15% of the generated power, they produced up to 28% of the emissions. Thus, greenhouse gas emissions produced by the act of heating is considerably lower than that creating by using the refrigerator and lighting objects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-16 | Rajan wahla | 10 | view |
| 2020-11-18 | Jango Jo | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-17 | Rajan wahla | view |
- The table below gives information about the average annual distance travelled by adults and the types of travel in 1977 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays buy more and more things things which are unnecessary why it so happeningFossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas, are used in many countries. The use of alternative sources of energy, including wind and solar power, is encouraged. Is this 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002
- Nowadays, the traditions and customs relating to the food we eat and the way we eat are changing. Why is it happening? Do you think this kind of change is positive or negative? 73
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, regarding, second, thus, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96458151503 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2445672485 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237103203908 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868367532936 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908911518095 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131385302696 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733616177484 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.