Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage

Essay topics:

Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage.

The reading and the lecture offer two opposing views on the advantages that social might take by high taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy foods. Whereas the author of the reading suggests that there are many benefits for society with this policy, the lecturer argues that this concept is very challenging. She casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First, according to the text, high taxes on cigarettes could avoid people buying this product which is beneficial for their health. However, the lecturer asserts that the high price of cigarettes leads to buying lower price one which has lower quality as well. She also mentions that people will spend their money on expensive, unhealthy foods and with lack of money they are not be able to buy healthier foods.
Secondly, the author states that the tax of cigarettes and unhealthy foods is fair to be high because of the high medical costs of addicted people. Although, the lecturer disputes that in the case of addiction among all group of people such as low incomes and high incomes, the low incomes might have more pressure to satisfy their needs, and the same condition for unhealthy foods.
Finally, the text explains the profits which will government have by high cigarettes and unhealthy foods’ taxes, in favor of a variety of public projects. While the lecturer implies that it has many downsides as well. She believes that government might avoid banning the smoke of cigarettes in public places because of their profits. Government would not forfeit the incomes provided by high taxes of unhealthy foods or cigarettes.
To recap, the lecturer believes that this policy has many disadvantages which is not worth to be accomplished. She explains that low income people will be hurt from this notion and also, she says that government, due to its high income, will be encouraged to not avoid any smoking in public areas by any rule.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-31 madinaaaaaaaaaa 80 view
2023-08-30 madinaaaaaaaaaa 73 view
2023-03-13 saharmnd 80 view
2023-03-04 saharmnd 80 view
2022-10-12 jjj33333 52 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user amyabt :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture offer two op...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he reading by providing three reasons. First, according to the text, high taxes...
^^^^
Line 2, column 384, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ods and with lack of money they are not be able to buy healthier foods. Seco...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re not be able to buy healthier foods. Secondly, the author states that the tax...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he same condition for unhealthy foods. Finally, the text explains the profits w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...axes of unhealthy foods or cigarettes. To recap, the lecturer believes that thi...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 325.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95692307692 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43451318293 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489230769231 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0045085439 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.071428571 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12402788442 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493674790779 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549056163603 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746930469032 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057419008802 0.0443174109184 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.