At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
Do the advantage of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Recently, the phenomenon of countries’ population age distribution and its corresponding impacts have sparked a massive debate. In this regard, although several nations are utilizing their fairly large proportion of young population, there are various drawbacks. In my view, we can take the advantages of having young population into account regarding socioeconomic and medical aspects.
Obviously, the majority of population in developing nations such as China and India are adolescences. These young adults provide their countries with a huge energetic workforce. Consequently, it is likely that national gross production of such countries will climb significantly. Likewise, individuals who are in their twenties or thirties expect relatively lower ranges of salary than older ones, and so industries would benefit loads of low-price workforce.
Moreover, young people in comparison with their aged counterparts don’t need extra exorbitant medical cares. Generally speaking, the overall body shape of youths is far better than old individuals and they are capable of tolerating such age-related diseases as Alzheimer and Parkinson. Subsequently, the total amount of countries’ federal budgets which would spend on such issues could allocate to other sections of wellbeing.
On the other hand, we shouldn’t lose sight of disadvantages. As an adage: experience is the best teacher, the experiences of aged experts pave the way to train youngsters to enhance their abilities and skills that they don’t have. What’s more, authorities of young population countries should prepare the job market to recruit loads of young job-seekers, hence this process may burden significant expenditures on shoulders of budgets.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on cons and pros of this matter, I am inclined to believe that the merits of having a relatively large number of young adults far outweigh its downsides. However, managers would celebrate finding an adolescent who is seeking a job in some developed countries due to low-childbirth rate in not far distant future!
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-20 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-14 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | xxlusubuxx | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | englishessays | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation Do you agree or disagree 80
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Because university degrees can get jobs with higher salaries university students should pay full cost for their education Do you agree or not 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, such as, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67948717949 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1107845642 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647435897436 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4125048211 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.133333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228714811883 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661068233635 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054224166162 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115110680426 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403910475916 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.