The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the value of one nation’s export in different five goods and products- petroleum, engineered, gems and jewelry, agricultural and textiles in between 2015 and 2016, while the table depicts the real value change in percentages in same time period. The export value was given in billions dollar.
Overall, as shown in bar chart, petroleum products were the highest exported goods and textiles was the lowest in both year 2015 and 2016. However, textile has a highest percentage change in value.
To begin with, in 2015, petroleum products was the highest exported goods, which contribute around 60 billion dollars in one nation’s economy and it was followed by engineered goods with above 55 billion dollars. Similarly, gems and jewelry, agricultural products were recorded just over 40 and 30 billion dollars respectively. Furthermore, textile has a least contribution in economy with approximately 26 billion dollars. In term of 2016 export earning, export rose in all products and goods except gems and jewelry. Petroleum product rose insignificantly in 2016, just by nearly 2 billion dollar and recorded as the highest exported product of 2016 as well. Engineered goods was accounted just above 60 billion dollars and textile were recorded around 31 billion dollars. In contrast, in agricultural sector value almost remain constant as 2015, however in gems and jewelry, export decreased by about 2 billion dollars.
Morning to the table, except jems and jewelry, all four goods and products export rose in country, where textile demand upsurged by 15.24% , however agricultural products rose by tiny percentages, below 1%. Furthermore, petroleum products and engineered goods uplifted by 3% and 8.5% respectively in 2016. Gems and jewelry demand declined by 5.18% in one country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation buses trains subways Why Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay 56
- energy consumption in 2007 in US 73
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task You have lost your student identification card This has created some problems for you Write a letter to the director of student services In your letter advise them of your situation explain how this is affect 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ear 2015 and 2016. However, textile has a highest percentage change in value. ...
^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... respectively. Furthermore, textile has a least contribution in economy with appr...
^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... where textile demand upsurged by 15.24% , however agricultural products rose by t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, similarly, well, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 965.302439024 159% => OK
No of words: 282.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44326241135 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82611297679 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471631205674 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 283.868780488 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2332675652 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.642857143 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203119611414 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909076705143 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667341168802 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159718786607 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676343521563 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.