Some people think that one of the best solve environmentally problem is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
Nowadays, the majority of people think about the bad impacts on the environment but augmenting the price of fuels is not a key source of personal cars and vehicles. It only affects the model class person, they can not afford the fuels. So that is why a minimum amount of vehicles use is a curb. I deem that, another kind of problems, which are harming the environment. Such as global warming, developing industrialised. It is more affected rather than fuels which are used in vehicles.
First of all, the prime reason why cars and other vehicles are preferred. Because of the convenience, but the fuels price are augmented people will not be able to afford it. They would crave to use public transportation and it succour to curb the environmental situation.
However, only low-class people are not able to purchase that fuels. On other hand, wealthy people will continue to use their private vehicles. So that impact will be in small quantity. Other many alternatives fuels are available, which are not harmful to the environment, such as renewable sources. It can be made easily. People also use the CNG ( compressed natural gas). At present many vehicles are run by it. It is a natural fuel and it does not affect the environment. So that it also helps to stop new problems related to the atmosphere.
After that, people must do some activities. Which are succour to save the environment, like commence tree planting. It helps the environment. Also, stop deforestation as well as natural areas and wild animals should be protected by the government. The public should choose product with less packaging because most food is sold in non-biodegradable plastics packaging. People must be curd these things to protect the environment.
I recapitulation, the government could introduce law and limit for environment protection and also doing campaigning for that. I believe that individuals should burn midnight oil to save the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-05 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-04 | vuhieuquy | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | tnhoangthien | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-20 | tnhoangthien | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-14 | bhatt95 | 56 | view |
- Some people think that instead of prevention climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology 56
- Some people think that instead of prevention climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish They cause water and land pollution and so they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind if the meat in European countries between 1979and 2004 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'succours'?
Suggestion: succours
...ave to use public transportation and it succour to curb the environmental situation. H...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...continue to use their private vehicles. So that impact will be in small quantity. Other...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be made easily. People also use the CNG compressed natural gas. At present many ...
^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and it does not affect the environment. So that it also helps to stop new problems rela...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, well, kind of, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04361370717 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97019873595 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542056074766 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1773239645 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 62.2692307692 106.682146367 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.3461538462 20.7667163134 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.03846153846 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205514530684 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053132390842 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393486219679 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113661798888 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162597107743 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.0946893788 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 50.2224549098 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.06 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.