The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates destinations of students majoring in Anthropology after graduating from one university while the table describes the earnings of anthropologists with 5-year working experience.
In general, the majority of Anthropology graduates decided to pursue a full-time career and after 5 years of employment, anthropologists working in government sector received higher salaries than those in freelance consultants and private companies.
As depicted in the pie chart, over half of the Anthropology-majored graduates chose to enter the job market with a full-time position immediately. Meanwhile, the percentages of those who worked part-time or were unemployed were rather similar with 15 percent and 12 percent respectively. The same pattern can be identified when comparing the number of people with full-time postgrad study and people with unknown destination as either group accounted for precisely 8 percent of the whole surveyed population. Taking up the smallest proportion of the chart with 5 percent are graduates who managed their part-time occupation and postgrad education at the same time.
As can be seen from the table, the percentages of anthropologists earning less than $75,000 were exactly the same in both freelance consultants and government sector with 20 percent whereas in private companies, this figure represented nearly half of their total employees with 45 percent. Among those who received more than $75,000, the numbers of people who obtained between $75,000 and $99,000 and those obtaining over $100,000 in freelance consultant saw no difference as each group comprised of 40 percent. Given the benchmark of $100,000, half of state-run organization employees could surpass the salary of $100,000 while only almost a third of those working for private companies could acquire the similar income.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are made 61
- The graph below shows information about the languages that 13 year old students in one school chose to study 91
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 73
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 471, Rule ID: ENTIRELY_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'group composed of'?
Suggestion: group composed of
...ce consultant saw no difference as each group comprised of 40 percent. Given the benchmark of 00,0...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 965.302439024 161% => OK
No of words: 277.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62093862816 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15021203061 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559566787004 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 283.868780488 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.0397037457 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.0 112.824112599 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7777777778 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141938273181 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781118222166 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941761214962 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141234654661 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108434716734 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.2329268293 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.91 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 40.7170731707 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.