People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
In the modern world, environmental issue is a matter which has provoked considerable debate. It is wildly believed that the fee of fuel that is used for cars and other vehicles should be increased by government in order to mitigate pollution. In my opinion, this solution is useful but we can have other measures to solve environmental problems.
On the one hand, the idea that the authority raised the cost of fuel is quite plausible for two main reasons. One reason why people propose this is that this action can help to reduce vehicle emissions and greenhouse effect. For example, people will limit using cars if they have to pay a lot of money for fuel. From this, air pollution is decreased. It should also be noted that humans can protect the environment by using other transportations that are environmentally friendly because of the high cost of fuel for cars.
On the other hand, the alternative suggestion of encouraging to using public transportations seems more likely to be effectively in practice. The obvious reason is travelling by public transportations is the best way to cut down air pollution. In detail, people will be tend to using bus if they are supported bus tickets by government. To illustrate this, nowadays, more and more people choose bus to their offices to save money. Furthermore, the rich can still drive their car in spite of high cost of fuel. Therefore, the government should also promote social campaigns to protect the environment and encourage everyone to join together. Take for example, the campaigns must make humans realize that going by bus or bike can help them protect their health.
In conclusion, governments should not only increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles but they can also take other measures to solve environmental problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- Nowadays people always throw the old things away when they buy new things some people claim that the broken things should be repaired and used again What factors cause this phenomennon What effects this phenomennon leads to 78
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 61
- Both men and women these days work full time so it is logical for them to share household chores equally To what extent do you agree or disagree 60
- The chat below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Topic Researcher shows that global warming is caused by human activity What are the possible reasons and effects of climate change and what can government and individuals do to reduce these 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bus'
Suggestion: to bus
..., nowadays, more and more people choose bus to their offices to save money. Further...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9701986755 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87732340146 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509933774834 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3273887929 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8125 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363041544718 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117302247093 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122315760632 0.0667982634062 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28745239357 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12545711811 0.056905535591 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.