In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars.
Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
In many countries, small town-centre shops are threatened to close because they can not compete with the large stores that are based on the outskirts. This leads to a number of consequences, including a rise in car usage and access to large out-of-town stores becoming limited for those without cars. In my opinion, this change has more disadvantages and here are my reasons.
The trend towards shopping in the larger stores has many negative impacts for the environment as well as locals' lives. More and more shoppers going to the large shops would lead to traffic congestion. Additionally, gas emissions released from cars are the main factors of environmental pollution. Moreover, many poor families in their hometown have to save money to buy a car instead of improving the quality of their family life. MoreoverAs a result, buying a car forces them to work arduously.
Besides, closing a small town-centre shop could pose local citizens in unemployment situations. If they can not earn money in their hometown, more and more people would immigrate to the big city to find jobs. Therefore, metropolises become overpopulated and it causes an increase in the number of social issues such as crimes, pollution and diseases. Moreover, people without cars buying products in large stores could (get) create many inconvenient problems. Vietnam is a typical example that people do not tend to purchase food in the market centres, because (this) my country has many local markets that could meet citizen’s demand with a variety of food even fresher than shopping centres.
In conclusion, this change in people’s shopping brings many disadvantages to citizens living in their hometown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | NHU95 | 78 | view |
- Leadership has always been playing an indispensable part in today s society the ability to make tough decisions or solve problems However therefore it has become a controversial issue for many people which makes lots of divided opinions on it Some believe 78
- It is true that mobile phones and the internet have influenced the communication between people The development of cell phones and the internet has significantly affected the relationship of people and in my opinion there are both positive and negative ef 73
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 78
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Today there are plenty of opposing opinions as to whether governments should dedicate a considerable part of their budget to reinstating run down buildings or not It is claimed that public purse should be expended on the construction of new and safer buil 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In many countries, small town-centre shops ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83635834006 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9711820076 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322373293377 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972264896414 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768462248078 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176010296709 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865337765854 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.