The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019.
The line graph compares three types of crimes committed in Panama City in terms of the amount of incidents happened over the period of 9 years.
It is clear that, the most considerable change occurred in the numbers of burglaries, while incidents of theft and robbery remained low but steady.
In 2010, it is obvious that the burglary was the most common crime, with approximately 3400 reported cases. The figure rose to around 3700 in 2011 but from 2011 onwards shown downward trajectory until 2015. At this point, the figure stood at just over 1,000 incidents. This rose slightly in 2016, then continued to fluctuate for the remaining period.
In 2010, the number of car being stolen stood at around 2800 and followed a similar trend to burglary until 2013. At this point the number rose, standing at around 2200 in 2014. There was a marginal decrease in the following year, but from then on, the trend was generally upwards.
Finally, robbery has always been a by far the most minor problem for Panama City. The number of offences committed changed little over nine years. It is interesting to note that the figure of approximately 700 in 2010 is the same figure for 2019.
- The given line graph below illustrates the number of people moved from rural to urban areas of three different countries 49
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 73
- The given line graph below illustrates the number of people moved from rural to urban areas of three different countries 78
- The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009 78
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to fluctuate for the remaining period. In 2010, the number of car being stolen ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79411764706 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42408775851 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4843389749 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.08333333333 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132693838439 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452682811874 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409674137387 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758844952768 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438511659822 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.