Sports should be made mandatory for all children as it helps in physical health. Do you agree or disagree?
Games are taking tremendous place in the life of toddlers and it also boots the intillegece as well as structure. It is stated that matches are the compulsary creation for young onces for their tangible body. However, I fully disagree with this statement still it will be necessity to discuss before reaching at personal conclusion.
It is noteworthy to mention that sports are releasing bad impact on children due to some reasons. The pivotal factor is exploration of young onces towards drugs which take the lives of innocent youngster. For instance, BJP school reveals that, a student has expired. He was well in playing because of drugs. He had started to take alcohol by influencing other players. Hence, it is enough to prove sport does help in physical health.
For more extension, some of the factors left which destroy body structure due to dangerous effect of sports. Firstly, brokeage of bones is most awful factor with this children will not able to survive their diserly. For example, dhoni was playing the match of cricket. Ball came with great speed which destroy the left leg of him that didn't recover. Now he is not eligible for walk and other obsessions. Therefore. it can not be denied games putting hazardous impact on youngsters.
In conclusion, after throwing the light on totally agreement, from my perspective, it has cleared that, instead of improving physical health by sport. It forces to children for destroying their body structure by taking drugs as well as breaking bones
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-14 | manvinder rai | 81 | view |
- Sports should be made mandatory for all children as it helps in physical health Do you agree or disagree 81
- Overpopulation in many major urban centres around the world is a major problem What are the causes of this How can this problem be solved 67
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally Discuss both the side and give your opinion 78
- The flow chart below shows an automatic photo booth
- The bar chart shows the percentage of elderly in three countries in 1980 2000and2030 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...physical health. For more extension, some of the factors left which destroy body structu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... which destroy the left leg of him that didnt recover. Now he is not eligible for wal...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...eligible for walk and other obsessions. Therefore. it can not be denied games putting haz...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...r walk and other obsessions. Therefore. it can not be denied games putting hazardo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02390438247 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59470543792 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621513944223 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1124772594 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.1764705882 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7647058824 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186836140265 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548263466691 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551475651498 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112960160501 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278252655054 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.