All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Every company strives for maximum profits. Sometimes there are internal problems in the company, which reduce it's efficiency. In such case, finding and solving the problem becomes utmost crucial task of the Human Resources Department.
The given statement gives two distinct methods. One is to hire outside consultants, and other is to take feedback from their own employees. I cannot completely agree with the former blanket statement, as there are many situations in which it is not fruitfull. Hiring outside consultants can help the CEO evalute it's company in the current market, how other comapnies are performing. They give expert advice, as to what changes are needed in the current method of working. As they are external consultant, they are hired by multiple companies, and soon they understand the trends, then they can give a valid and successful advice to their clients. As they compare the working standards of one company with other firms, they can also be a sourve of leakage of company secrets. Take for example: coca-cola manufacturing plant. Their recepie for the drink is a secret, which many don't know. If this company is not working efficiently, hiring outside consultant might not be an ideal choice. As they can try to get hands on that recepie. However, confedentiality agreement can be signed to restrict such actions. We will discuss below why the latter part of the statement might be an ideal choice.
Companies, who hire outside consultants, often have to pay payement to them. Which can iccure as additional costs to them, with no guarantee that the services given will be usefull. Hence, most of the times, it is advisable to take feedback from their own employees. Employees work at the very core of the company, they know what will motivate them, what changes will make them work more efficiently. However, it is not true most of the time. Employees can either be new or they could be working for few years. The new ones will not be able to provide a valuable feedback as they haven't given their full confidence, and might not be knowing how a company can work more efficiently. Employees who have worked for quite a few years can give valuable feedback, as they know exactly how the firm works. Although, the employees can give valuable feedback, there is no guarantee that this feedback will be usefull or not. Employees who have worked in multiple firms before will have experience to answer such questions.
All in all, the given statement holds it's validity in it's own views. Outside consultants can be a good option, but taking feedback from employees will be a better option.
- Some believe that local communities should rely on citizen volunteers for projects benefiting those communities e g organizing youth sports leagues and collecting donations for charity Others believe that local communities are better served when professio 50
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- Fossil evidence indicates that the blompus an extremely large carnivorous land mammal inhabited the continent of Pentagoria for tens of thousands of years until its sudden decline and ultimate extinction about twelve thousand years ago Scientists have det 60
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 75
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 877, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e for the drink is a secret, which many dont know. If this company is not working ef...
^^^^
Line 3, column 988, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...onsultant might not be an ideal choice. As they can try to get hands on that recep...
^^
Line 5, column 581, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
... to provide a valuable feedback as they havent given their full confidence, and might ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 631, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...en their full confidence, and might not be knowing how a company can work more efficiently...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2184.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95238095238 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.618844413 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489795918367 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4570680821 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.0 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.10714285714 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237081034164 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682518545925 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054447507901 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146472259352 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036070131478 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.