The table below shows the amount of waste produxtion( in millions tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty- year period
The provided table illustrates the amount of waste output in various countries during a period of 2 decades starting from 1980 to 2000.
It can be seen from the table, in each of three years, the US produced more waste than Ireland, Japan, Korea, Poland, and Portugal combined. It is also noticeable that Korea was the only country that managed to reduce its waste production by the year 2000.
Between 1980 and 1990, the amount of waste output in the US went up from 131 million tonnes to 151 million tonnes, and rising trends were true for Japan, Poland and Portugal. Waste production of Japan rose from 28 to 32 million tonnes, while Poland and Portugal saw wase totals increase from 4 million tonnes to 5 million tonnes and 2 million tonnes to 3 million tonnes, respectively.
Looking the table in more detail, the trends for Korean and Ireland were noticeably different from those described above. In Ireland, waste production grew more than eightfold, from only 0,6 million tonnes in 1980 to 5 million tonnes in 2000. Korea, by contrast, cut its waste production by 12 million tonnes between 1990 to 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-14 | uyenmia | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | uyenmia | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-13 | quytnee | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-20 | thuphuong2302 | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | buiminhduc | 67 | view |
- Some people say it is important to keep your home and your workplace tidy with everything organised and in the correct place What is your opinion about this 56
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system 56
- Some people believe that reading stories from books better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say it is important to keep your home and your workplace tidy with everything organised and in the correct place What is your opinion about this 56
- Forests are the lungs of the earth Destruction of the world s forests amounts to death of the world we currently know To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experie 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the US went up from 131 million tonnes to 151 million tonnes, and rising trends...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80729166667 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39940291148 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6467039149 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.375 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27649595065 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135189744905 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568315811181 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17554202101 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463609795054 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.