Advertising encourages consumer to buy in a quantity rather than promoting quality to what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is undeniable fact that, in millennium days, people are influenced by the ads, it encourages them to buy product in bulk instead of, focusing the quality. If asked, I would certainly agree with such an opinion to a large extent, and the reasons for my stand will be analyzed further.
There are several reasons behind, why people are encouraged by ads to buy in a quantity. Firstly, adverts could promote the different schemes. By this I mean, super marketers or producer promote schemes, like one-on-one, discounts and many more through advertisement to increase selling of their products, this influence the people to buy those products in a quantity, despite the product's quality. For example, in India, there are numbers of resellers of cloth companies, who promote different types of schemes to attract people to buy in lots.
Furthermore, ads lured the people to buy in bulk by attractive images. By this I mean that, these days, manufacturers are used interesting images and videos for people's attention, with this type of pictures people enable themselves to buy their products, without thinking about the actual need. According to one survey, 23% of American mentioned that they never used those products, which they bought in quantity, after watching ads.
On the other hand, ads might be beneficial to the people for buying good quality products as well. First, it could be promoted good quality materials. In other words, in today's fast pace life, people faced difficulties in finding time to find good quality products, therefore ads may be found helpful to them, as promoters and produces share relevant information about their materials. For instance, in India, companies, like Samsung and LG share their new good quality products information through billboards and TV ads to the people.
In conclusion, I reiterate that, the advertisement encourage people to buy in lots, as promote different schemes and attractive photos, however it would be beneficial to people to get relevant information about good quality products as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-20 | dhruv j patel | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-26 | ketul | 73 | view |
- Why criminals commit crimes whey they set free from the prison What are the causes of this case What are the solutions 78
- Some people believe that government should pay a for expanding the RO system while some people believe that local people should pay discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- Advertising encourages consumer to buy in a quantity rather than promoting quality to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Vehicle free day private cars trucks and motorcycles are banned in the City centre while the public transfer is permitted such as a bicycle bus and access to the benefits of vehicles free day outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Children are taught to push themselves to try and be better than their classmates rather than work together Do you think the advantage outweigh it s disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 471, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
...ung and LG share their new good quality products information through billboards and TV a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40557275542 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13477238697 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53560371517 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 4.76152304609 336% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6552259019 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.714285714 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7857142857 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152317796616 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064860283474 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346283137129 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973532074223 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374953798559 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.