Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Human activities such as construction, farming activities, building plant, etc. had destroyed the habitat of many plant and animal species. If endangered species become extinct as a result of human activities, then only it becomes the responsibility of society to save them. Personally, I completely disagree with this suggestion and argue that society should strive to protect endangered species for three reasons.
Firstly, whatever should be the cause of extinction; endangered species must be conserved because they play vital role in food web. For instance: if the population of deer is decreasing due to effect of human activities or any other factor, it must be conserved; otherwise, it hampers the population of lion who depends upon deer for their saviour. This leads towards disturbance the chain of food web and ultimately ecosystem.
Secondly, many people depend directly or indirectly upon the species for their livelihood. For instance: yarshagumbha- also known as the caterpillar fungus- is found in the Himalayan region of Nepal, India, Tibet, Bhutan, etc. People of Himalayan region hinge on yarshagumba for their earning and living. They harvest yarshagumba for months, sold them and spent the remaining months from the income earned from the selling. Yarshagumba is only the source of income for people of region. They must utilize the species sustainably. Otherwise, species will become disappear and will become difficult for people who entirely depend upon such species for survivor.
Once the endangered species are gone, they are gone forever; there will be no coming back. And our future generation won’t get opportunity to get benefits from them and read about them only on books. For instance: dianosours were extinct millions of years ago, we can read about their body structure and activities performed by them only on books. If our ancestors had preserved them, then we get opportunity to observe them in present time.
In the end, people might argue that if the cause of extinction of endangered species isn’t because of human activities, why should they be responsible to protect them? Whatever might be the causes of disappearance of such species; their effect will always be upon human. So it is prudent to protect the endangered species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-31 | savaga1883 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Alex Cheng | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | graceeehgq | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | soap | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | M1randa | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian a company that manufactures men s clothing Five years ago at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric we discontinued production of 79
- People who work in the arts and humanities should earn less than those who work in the sciences and economics because of the benefit of the arts and humanities to the population is less important than that of the scientific or economic endeavors 54
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun plant seems to be countable; consider using: 'many plants'.
Suggestion: many plants
...lant, etc. had destroyed the habitat of many plant and animal species. If endangered speci...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30662983425 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79246244824 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513812154696 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4785139582 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4761904762 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2380952381 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.19047619048 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257875582479 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081675121781 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905126466143 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161058894757 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998951928293 0.0667264976115 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.