Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
We're living in world where one cannot be too careful. Especially with the work undertaken by large companies, all the information that they are privy too needs to be protected. Unwarranted exposure of this information can lead to dire consequences such as lawsuits, plummeting of share value, etc. The prompt suggests that companies should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence in order to avoid the above-mentioned situations. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this policy recommendation that surveillance of employee e-mails is a necessary safeguard to ensure to smooth functioning of an enterprise for the two reasons.
To begin with, employees working at these companies have access to a lot of sensitive information. Information which is crucial to their clients and may hold high monetary value. Thereby, these clients sign non-disclosure agreements with companies to make sure their data is secure. In an increasingly competitive world, your rival company will stop at nothing to secure an advantage in the market. For instance, while working at a law firm, as an employee you have insider information to a disputed land deal. There is case going on in court and the opposing counsel approaches a co-worker to provide this information so he can exploit it to have an upper hand in court. These things often happen because a lot of money can be offered to this co-worker and personally he may not have much at stake even if his firm loses the case. When the client realizes that underhanded means were used to access his information and someone in the firm leaked this data, he can proceed to sue the firm for a lot of money. To avoid, these situations it is necessary for the company to monitor e-mail correspondence of their employees and even put in place advanced machine learning systems in place to detect fraudulent behaviour.
In addition to this, e-mail storage if not managed efficiently can cause the company to spend too much money and resources to acquire additional server capacity. Employees can sometimes be wasteful in the way that they manage their e-mail accounts. For instance, there are a lot of temporary services one can avail to send large attachments without sacrificing on your storage capacity. One can use a service called we-transfer to send files upto two gigabytes. Using this instead of attaching files via google drive can save you on storage space. After employee orientation training, some might still absent mindedly use archaic methods of file transfer while going through their day to day work. When there are multiple employees working with the same carelessness, the company suffers because they need to constantly upgrade their storage which is an expensive endeavour. Therefore, it is beneficial to the company to instead monitor e-mail correspondence and notify the employee when they are not being efficient with their use of system capacity. An overloaded storage often slows down the ability of systems to operate efficiently.
One might bring up the issue of privacy being violated because of this monitoring of correspondence. However, don't companies provide employees with separate e-mail ids to be used during office hours and official correspondence? Also, employees that are aware that their e-mail are being monitored will be more diligent during their workday so as to not waste time during working hours. For these reasons, I strongly believe that monitoring of e-mail correspondence benefits the company in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 75 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | Aaishani De | 58 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | Chaitanya02 | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | asm01 | 83 | view |
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting lethargy and other signs of illness After the recall the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food an 58
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school Last year Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor Swift Nutrition This company serves low fat low calorie meals th 64
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society 50
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity as well as protect the company from lawsuits Write a response in which you discu 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... monitoring of correspondence. However, dont companies provide employees with separa...
^^^^
Line 7, column 341, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...l be more diligent during their workday so as to not waste time during working hours. Fo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 58.6224719101 145% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2954.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 568.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20070422535 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88187981987 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91114997684 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 945.0 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6232255123 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.407407407 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.037037037 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.59259259259 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234098919656 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694277991771 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724689324471 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157813803174 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382289731852 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.