Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face, is this a positive or negative development?
In today’s society, rather than taking part in direct communication, people tend to do this through the Internet network. Some believe that this phenomenon is beneficial for people while I do state that the disadvantage outweighs these.
Firstly, online socialization can result in negativities in people's daily life. This has been shown that the more addicted to virtual life, the harder development of crucial skills can be gained such as communication skill or problem-solving one. To be exact, people spend the majority of their time chatting with others through social platforms like Facebook and Instagram, therefore, being indifferent in interacting with others in reality. As a consequence, it is hard to build up attachment in relationships or searching for a good job afterward.
Additionally, this phenomenon also leads to a detrimental effect on user's psychology. Communication is indeed a very basic demand of each person. If people lack direct communication and emotional support, the lonely and isolated feeling from society will be deeply rooted in people's minds. Therefore, many people would suffer mental disorders such as depression or insomnia, which make their physical health even be affected.
Moreover, people choosing online interactions can be exposed to the risk of violated privacy. Because of the communication with fake identities or anonymous accounts, the personal information of users is likely to be stolen. Taking the commercial aspect as an example, some people take advantage of this for profitable purposes by selling it to third parties at sky-high prices.
In conclusion, there are opposing opinions about whether socialize online is a positive development or not. With these aforementioned ideas, I am subscribed to the view that this kind of communication brings a much greater negative influence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-09 | citra orwela | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-30 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | Vinuki | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-27 | Geegeepay | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-27 | Geegeepay | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 78
- The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 78
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'users'' or 'user's'?
Suggestion: users'; user's
...n also leads to a detrimental effect on users psychology. Communication is indeed a v...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, third, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56537102473 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16827362644 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65371024735 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2381204053 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239674727565 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767060468071 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630818178617 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129104872995 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392540294845 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.