1. Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person. Why do you think this is the case? What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Developing of technology brings people closer than ever before only in virtual life and physical appearance as well as social bonding are greatly facing a harsh consequences. Advancement of social networking service and accessibility of those application are the significant among copious number of reasons for this. However, the online socialising can be tackled by indulging the teenagers to the development of social program and developing physical bonding among the society member.
The development of social communicating apps are the first and foremost reason for the detachment of teenagers from the face to face social communications. Online networking service provider develop their system in that a way which easily attracts the adolescents as they can share their feelings in a short time to not only their closed ones but also the people of distance relationship. For example, a young individuals can have a immense number of friends and followers in a online platform named Facebook, where the individual can clearly get attention of many peoples which will connect them and eventually build a virtual bond. This circumstance responsible for a young citizen to pass a great quantity of time in online in socializing that often become more provident due to the easy accessibility of those websites. One with a little knowledge can make friends with their community that ultimately give access to the private and social life of every individuals.
Although, there are various cause of the development of virtual socializing, that can be alleviated by ensuring the participations of teenagers in events held by the society members. If younger generation take parts in the social development that will certainly build a good communication among the social beings. Additionally, the individuals might help themselves by not involving in social networking sites due to the duties towards the community. A recent survey published in a scientific journal revealed that, almost 90% of youth generation believe they will not lead the online life if they were provide with proper social benefits like sports, cultural events, and recreational programs.
This solution frequently lead to develop the physical bonding among the members of the society.
In conclusion, this essay discussed that online interaction by teenagers have been developing owing to the beneficial aspects of the modern technology. It was also justified that proper involvement of them in social well-beings could be potential solutions to retrieve the in person meetings to the society.
- Smacking children is the best form of discipline To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- 1 Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 73
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consequence'?
Suggestion: consequence
...cial bonding are greatly facing a harsh consequences. Advancement of social networking servi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this application' or 'those applications'?
Suggestion: this application; those applications
...networking service and accessibility of those application are the significant among copious numbe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'individual'?
Suggestion: individual
...ance relationship. For example, a young individuals can have a immense number of friends an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r example, a young individuals can have a immense number of friends and followers...
^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ense number of friends and followers in a online platform named Facebook, where t...
^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... in events held by the society members. If younger generation take parts in the so...
^^
Line 5, column 604, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...l not lead the online life if they were provide with proper social benefits like sports...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the in person meetings to the society.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2173.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45979899497 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03300052665 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530150753769 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.5738165463 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.866666667 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5333333333 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12336603021 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454140436836 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402644750876 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763540494061 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538676716485 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.