More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Time flies, dragging drastic alterations in human awareness regarding shopping patterns when consumers are inclined to purchase high-cost items due to the quality as well as the durability of the product. I, as a fervent advocate for this movement, firmly believe that with certain advantages towards the country’s economy and the environment, this is likely a positive development.
It is conspicuous that expending money on expensive products seems to guarantee the quality and usage time for buyers. To begin with, once companies set a high cost for their commodities, it means that they are able to ensure the best quality for users. Obviously, no new undefined brand which first floats into the market can sell expensive products, this just eventuates with giant companies which have a strong reputation built up for years. Therefore, consumers can safely consider getting the best quality products under the aspect of reliability. Moreover, the high-cost products are supposed to last longer in comparison to the cheap ones. In order to create quality merchandise, manufacturers must apply the best materials and ingredients. Even more intriguing is that these items must be inspected several times for different tests to value their cost. Take Toshiba’s washing machine as an exemplary example, this giant cooperation used to publicize a short video showing how the products were tested before being ready for purchasing. This legit then was proved when it could operate for nearly 20 years without any heinous repair or maintenance.
Furthermore, I express my fixed belief that shopping for expensive products seems to bring more good than harm due to the positive impact on the environment and the economy. In terms of the environment, there is a woeful fact that the Earth is filled with tonnes of garbage released from each individual from household trash to home furnishing. It is no exaggeration to assert that humans’ shopping habits must be responsible for all deteriorated consequences on the environment. That is because consumers can discard every low-cost item without hesitation; however, this would never happen with an expensive one. They have to think twice before making any decision of disposal. What is even more potential for this shopping behavior is the prosperity of the economy. Notwithstanding the difference in purchasing purposes of customers, the sales gained from selling high-cost products can assist companies’ development which in turn leads to the thriving economy of the country due to the soaring amount of taxes. That results in stability in employment, which is the core factor creating a wealthy economy.
In conclusion, the shift to obtain expensive products may come from discrete purposes, this positively gives the merits to not only the economy but the environment as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 11 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | majhar | 78 | view |
- What causes global warming The only way to deal with is from governments not individuals What are your opinion 76
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 78
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and televisions in order to decrease violent crimes in society To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- u
- Task 2 Some people think that childcare centers provide the best services for children of preschool age Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better carers for their kids Do you agree or disagree with the statement 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2397.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 446.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37443946188 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89134841109 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589686098655 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9635453376 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.85 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0711573547633 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0236328418488 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335200718615 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0448238732441 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247106388052 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.