More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars, and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It is true that a growing number of individuals are inclined towards purchasing renowned brands over generic alternatives. There are various reasons contributing to this trend, which, in my opinion, has more negative repercussions on human well-being.
The motivations behind opting for high-end products can be attributed to personal usage experiences and the desire for social validation. To begin with, products associated with established brand names often undergo meticulous craftsmanship and intricate production processes. This attention to detail can result in an enhanced quality experience for consumers, particularly those with discerning preferences. Additionally, owning such prestigious items can bolster one's personal or professional image, facilitating the perception of being stylish, fashionable, or belonging to a higher social class, thus aligning with specific subcultures or peer groups.
However, despite these factors, I believe that this trend brings about more drawbacks than benefits. The pursuit of well-known brand products frequently entails substantial costs. Those who prioritize such purchases may find themselves overspending or accumulating debt in their endeavor to keep up with prevailing trends, ultimately leading to financial strain. Moreover, numerous high-end brands engage in excessive production, which contributes to the overconsumption of resources and further exacerbates environmental degradation. The mass production of these goods can result in pollution, waste generation, and the depletion of valuable natural resources.
In conclusion, while the pursuit of enhanced product experiences and social approval underpin the growing demand for luxury items, I consider this development to be predominantly negative due to its associated financial burdens and adverse impact on the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 11 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | majhar | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by 3 companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Some companies sponsor sport and sports stars as a way to advertise themselves Some people think it is good while others think there are disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by 3 companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The plan shows the design of a community centre 10 years ago and now 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ning such prestigious items can bolster ones personal or professional image, facilit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.25490196078 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28274413767 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701960784314 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4210216633 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.916666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0871208467129 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326102099516 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366418376406 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0604988921178 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380973013268 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.97 12.4159519038 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.49 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.