The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates the unemployment circumstance in rural and urban regions over the course of 4 months in 2012.
Looking at the graph, It is immediately obvious that the proportion of the unemployed in urban areas experienced an upward trend over the period given, while the opposite is true for rural areas. The rate in urban regions peaked by the second and third quarters.
At the start of the period, the countryside registered the highest figure for joblessness, beginning by 6.5%, whereas that rate in cities was lower, at about 2%. In the first half of 2012, there was a double increase in the proportion of jobless people in urban regions from 2% to 4%. On the contrary, an opposite trend was witnessed in rural areas, which fell steadily over the first six months and immediately hit the lowest point of 4.5% after that.
In the third quarter, the urban unemployment rate declined steeply to 2% before going up gradually. It continued to rise and reached the peak at nearly 5% at the end of the period. On the other hand, the number of jobless people in the countryside reached a plateau and finished at a fairly high point of 5%, slightly above cities.
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 54
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it the lowest point of 4.5% after that. In the third quarter, the urban unemploy...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, second, third, whereas, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76097560976 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62301169705 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551219512195 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3429740544 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.444444444 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0401205007175 0.215688989381 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.019810203412 0.103423049105 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0254528803088 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0334626246626 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248054390027 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.