the diagrams show changes in Happy Valley Shopping center in 1989 and 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The maps illustrates the changes that took place in Happy Valley Shopping Center between 1982 and 2012.
Overall, the shopping center underwent a number of changes, the most important of which are the disapperance of lake and the appearance of modern facilites.
In the west, the lake was knocked down to make way for the furniture retail, which was accompanied by the destruction of trees. In the north-west, the trees and the road was cleared to make way for the parking lot. Meanwhile, in the north of the shopping center, the coffee was removed to become open space, and in the center of the shopping center, the lobby was demolished to make way for the entrance.
In the east, most of trees was chopped down to make way for the expansion of the shopping center. This section also witnessed a number changes, with the sport and electronics store was replaced by the themed restaurants, the furniture store was converted to food store. In the northern section, the food store was turned into the sport and electronics store. Futhermore, no change was made to in the center and southern part of the shopping center.
- Many people think that modern communication technology is having a negative effect on social relationships To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people think that modern communication technology is having a negative effect on social relationships To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- the diagrams show changes in Happy Valley Shopping center in 1989 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The maps illustrates the changes that took place in Happy Va...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 14, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the trees') or simply say ''most trees''.
Suggestion: most of the trees; most trees
...ake way for the entrance. In the east, most of trees was chopped down to make way for the ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81865284974 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59075647536 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466321243523 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4030433831 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16375316868 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897279324581 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080934997921 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127233213937 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734953606715 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.