For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is assumed that in terms of how intelligent children become and how they develop socially, teachers have a greater impact than folks. From my perspective, I do not agree with this statement as both aspects are of equal significance.
On one hand, it is tangible that parental factors are indispensable to children’s smartness and social development. Initially, parents contribute significantly to children’s IQ index. This is derived from the fact that children’s intelligence is inherited from their parents; hence, it has a close connection with the intelligence of their parents. For example, intelligent mothers have a higher tendency to give birth to smart children than normal ones and vice versa. Besides, parents gain a deep understanding of their children from daily life so children’s ability and personality can be shaped by their parents. Also, parents have more opportunities to assist their offspring to cultivate their flair and accumulate their social experience through daily activities.
On the other hand, schooling plays a vital part in children’s intelligence and social interaction. Firstly, teachers are properly equipped with teaching techniques to help children figure out their flairs and interests and make plans for their future. Therefore, children have a stronger affinity to being trained and attaining skills and experience and boost their intellectual capability. Moreover, not only do teachers provide academic knowledge but they also impart moral values. As a result, children will develop both morally and educationally.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, my verdict is that both parental and educational factors are equally and simultaneously indispensable to the well-rounded development of school children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
- People in many countries are spending less time with their families What are the reasons and effects of this 78
- Cycling is healthier and environmentally friendly form of transport Nevertheless cycling is getting less popular What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to make cycling more popular 84
- People are living longer than in the past Many people think that this trend is negative for society To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In most parts of the world the volume of traffic is growing at an alarming rate In the form of an assignment discuss the main traffic problems in your country their causes and possible solutions 89
- More companies have opened working areas without walls or barriers on their desks Do the disadvantages of open plan offices outweigh the advantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80681818182 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28328255404 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598484848485 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8332134614 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489234709593 0.244688304435 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152637774953 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779299338082 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256073972674 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113490725507 0.056905535591 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.