Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Acceptance of a poor condition, for instance, an unsuitable career or financial difficulties, is claimed to be the first and foremost option by some people. However, others suggest that it is more effective when people try their best to upgrade such negative situations. There are many explanations why people support the first statement, in contrast, I think that the best for those is to try and develop their conditions.
Some people think that living comfortably with a bad situation is the most optimal choice. There are numerous reasons why they pursue their judgements. To begin, when adapting with a severe situation, there is a likelihood for humanity to develop their skills, especially those which are linked with survival. The example is obvious when looking at the urban migrants. Despite the poor living standards, they still have the ability to overcome difficulties and live happily. Moreover, the worse our situations are, the more we respect our properties. This case is the lifetime lesson that is necessary for the majority of the population as what they are experiencing currently, from culture diversity to peace, in spite of their conditions, are the achievements that their ancestors have tried for millennia to gain.
On the other hand, making efforts and improving the negative situations are suggested to be the most optimal option. By doing that, people can encourage others who witness the similar aspects to join the phenomenon as they are setting a good example for people across social standards to learn from. In addition, trying and developing situations such as a dead-end job or shortage of money significantly reduce the pressure of criminals on national authorities since this problem depends on citizens moral standards. When seeking for solutions to upgrade the situations legally, people will not be controlled by the power of money and impacts of some negative parts of the society as the priority is not only living standards but also social influence.
To put things in a nutshell, although many people believe that adapting to current conditions in spite of their difficulties is the best, i wholeheartedly believe that making efforts to improve such situations can benefit individuals and the whole society in general.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-09 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-23 | hau le | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 61
- Some people believe that one world government would be better than a national government Do you think the benefits of this system outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 content com android chrome FileProvider images screenshot 16321376288372007373030 jpg 11
- People who have been close friends for a very long time have recently realised they have some feelings for each other They want to become a couple but afraid of negative consequences Do the advantages of being a couple outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 391, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
..., I think that the best for those is to try and develop their conditions. Some people ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, for instance, i think, in addition, in contrast, in general, such as, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25641025641 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82220928002 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528205128205 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5990014719 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.125 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6875 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248271773035 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781339298421 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646198938883 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158164340171 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565702392111 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.