A survey conducted for the places in which people gain access to the Internet from 1998 to 2004.
The chart gives information about the proportion of Internet access from 4 different places between 1998 and 2004.
Looking from an over perspective, the home was the primary source for Internet access that holding more than half of the total throughout the time frame.
As the chart portrays, the proportion of college remained relatively constant around 20% till 2002 when it showed an initial drop by 2-3 %. Meanwhile, approximately 53% of Internet access was from home, in the next three years, this proportion declined moderately to 45% before followed a significant rise to overtaking the original level.
On the other hand, from 1998 to 2002, the user accessing the Internet at work contributed to nearly 28% initially, where it started to hover around that percentage. Subsequently, a numerous sink to 12% was witnessed in the figure of work in 2004. In addition, the library's proportion, which occupied one to ten of the total subscribers in 1998, followed by an upward fluctuation and final touched the level of 12%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | maiphuonganh | 89 | view |
| 2022-04-07 | ngocanh12325 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-07 | beauty flowers | 95 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | duyenphung2011 | 62 | view |
| 2019-02-09 | lunamoondo | 67 | view |
- The graph shows Internet usage in Taiwan by age group 56
- The chart shows the number of international students from four different countries applying for universities in a European country from the year 2004 to 2008 78
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of fims produced by 5 different countries in 3 years 78
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84241780158 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660714285714 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6919930425 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276641329241 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121520824673 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951196640585 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178745213281 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885547770715 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.