The first chart below shows the percentages of women and men in a country involved in some kinds of home tasks (cooking, cleaning, pet caring and repairing the house. The second chart shows the amount of time each gender spent on each task per day. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given butterfly charts compare how much time are spend in one day and the proportion of tasks are performed between females and males on basis of housework, namely, cooking, cleaning, pet care and house repairs.
Overall, it is evident that females took responsibility for all chores, in contrast to males who lead-heavy work that much likes house repairs and pet care.
Beginning with the first chart, it is not denied that females played as housewifery so that most of the housework related to cooking and cleaning that are being given for females with its figures at 80% and 60%, in comparison with males who are less than two-fold in these categories at 60% and 40%, respectively. Surprised with the pet care witnessed an almost equal percentage at 20% of females and nearly 22% of males. Otherwise, a double of males to 20% than females to 9% that are pertained in repairing houses.
With the second chart, as mentioned in the information about females, concerning the cooking and cleaning, females spent more time than females in these works, in which it is shown on in doing that at 82 minutes and 69 minutes, males who spend time at 60 minutes and 40 minutes on each task. However, both males and females spend an average of 20 minutes for caring pets. Lastly, it is obvious that males have more capabilities in repairing their own houses than females within the time are spent at 5 minutes of females and 20 minutes for males.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-17 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | giangngoc | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | hyst12 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-11 | TranMinhDuc | 62 | view |
- People thought that the human race is steadily improving in every area of life ln which areas do you think we have made important progress in nowadays ln which areas do you think we still need to make progress in 89
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 61
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 78
- Some People Think That Mobile Phones Should Be Banned In Public Places Like Libraries Shops And On Public Transport To What Extent Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Statement 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...terfly charts compare how much time are spend in one day and the proportion of tasks ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...trast to males who lead-heavy work that much likes house repairs and pet care. Begi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74900398406 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51373269894 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521912350598 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.7329098666 43.030603864 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.375 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163209534622 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800178502072 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490835265601 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112311922104 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377805303241 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...terfly charts compare how much time are spend in one day and the proportion of tasks ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...trast to males who lead-heavy work that much likes house repairs and pet care. Begi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74900398406 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51373269894 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521912350598 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.7329098666 43.030603864 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.375 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163209534622 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800178502072 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490835265601 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112311922104 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377805303241 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.