It is a common belief that each person contributes almost nothing valuable in improving the environmental condition, but solely the efforts of governments, corporations and other big organisations could help. Personally, I utterly disapprove of this statement due to the fact that each individual is an indispensable part of society. Moreover, environmental problems should be handled by the whole globe including individuals and organisations.
Our society is a substantial unit of each individual, therefore, each personal distribution to the environment is valuable. Although the attempt of governments and corporations sounds much stronger and more widespread, these organisations are smaller units consists of different counterparts. One person, two people, they gradually assemble to the society at large and initiate various environmental campaigns in particular regions accordingly. As an excellent result, pollution, waste problems, wildlife preservation and biodiversity protection will be solved respectively if each person devotes their time and efforts.
In addition, the collaboration of organisations and each resident makes a complete difference in protecting the environment. That said the contribution of governments, companies and abundant organisations helps to raise social awareness and attention on environmental preservation campaigns. The more people attracted the better the environmental condition since "together we can change the world". For instance, on March 25th 2019, Vietnamese people responded to a "Green campaign" initiated by the government, which mitigated the domestic wastage in almost every corner of the country. Beforehand, some Vietnamese people tried to convey the "Green message", but it only works when the government gets involved in.
In conclusion, it is unreasonable to suppose that each person can do nothing valuable to the environment because, without people, there is no society. Nevertheless, for a holistic approach, governments and corporations should seriously take part in protecting the environment by conveying messages and practising.
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You sho 89
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your a 84
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities New York Sydney and London 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...th 2019, Vietnamese people responded to a 'Green campaign' initiated by...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.17845117845 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.60394578447 2.80592935109 128% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2937271268 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 131.071428571 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12448841878 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416708712078 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351292773425 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760346660063 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407322553544 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.56 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.