The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. (Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home, housework and gardening.)
The chart gives information about the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people classified into three specific segments.
Looking from an overall perspective, women who had married in all categories did significantly more hours than men of the same sections.
As the chart portrays, married women who had no child spent 30 hours a week on unpaid work compared to approximately 19 hours of men. Interestingly, the figure witnessed an enormous rise when married women possessed 1-2 children with more than 50 hours per week, which was still higher than men, whose figure showed no change. The distance between males and females extended when people had more than three children. To be precise, 60 hours was the time for those women to do the unpaid job, notice that the time frame of men dropped slightly. This pattern showed that women were responsible for most of the childcare, owing to being busier when having more children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-26 | Ducc Minh | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | beauty flowers | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | beauty flowers | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | beauty flowers | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | Sayansh Garg | 73 | view |
- The bar chart shows the highest qualification attained by sex for the working age population in Wales in 2001 2002 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 84
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age 78
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 78
- the bar chart below shows the results of a poll of theater goers on what disturbs them during performances at the theatre 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96835443038 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5336147405 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645569620253 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2308269776 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.142857143 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213316368698 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107684490905 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100110280556 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171877872794 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112837076795 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.