Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Environment degradation is no doubt to be the hottest topic in newspapers nowadays. One of the crucial solutions is to reduce domestic waste. However, some people think that not enough waste is recycled, and therefore, to ease the burden, the government should enforce the laws upon recycling.
There are issues when putting recycling as a law because there is a large amount of waste in the household such as organic waste, liquid waste, hazardous waste, and so on. Thus, not everyone is knowledgeable about domestic waste to classify recyclable and non-recyclable rubbish. Plus, they might expose to dangerous waste that they are unaware of. Yet, not all residents are unable to access this information given the fact that the internet has provided unlimited access to knowledge with just a click.
I believe that enforcing the law on the household recycling cycle will give us a lot of benefits in particular and to the environment in general. Firstly, if the laws are enforced, many people will have aware of environmental problems and their negative ramifications on living creatures' habitats included human beings. Secondly, this also creates a positive routine and habit for a family which avoids unnecessary waste in nature. Take Belgium as an example, while putting taxes on non-recyclable products, they also encourage their people to keep organic waste and turn it into fertilizer. In addition, Belgian authorities charge fees for households that do not classify correctly their waste into different bins. Consequently, this enforcement has brought Belgium with 90% of waste recycled.
In conclusion, I would restate that although there still remain drawbacks with putting recycling as a legal requirement, this solution will alleviating environmental problems and creating green living conditions for living creatures on the Earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 72
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'alleviate'
Suggestion: alleviate
...a legal requirement, this solution will alleviating environmental problems and creating gre...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, in general, in particular, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42013888889 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93722705259 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607638888889 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3815321176 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4285714286 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292076332949 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912322366077 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669570810818 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157046286906 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538997778891 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.