The chart below gives information about levels of education by age range in the UK in 2010.
The provided bar chart highlights data concerning education levels by five age groups (16-24, 24-35, 35-50, 50-75, 75+) in the United Kingdom during 2010.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that a university degree was the major education level for individuals from 16 to 75 years old in 2010. Another fascinating point is that most of the elderly who were over 75 years old had no qualifications during the same period.
Looking at the graph, it is clear that the proportion of 16-24 years old people who have a university degree in 2010 was 71%, compared to the elderly who were 75+ years old was contributed to only 25% in the same education level. The figure for individuals who had no qualifications in the age group 16-24 was only 9%, whereas the elderly (75+ years old) had a total of 72% of people who did not have any degrees. The percentage of people in the age group 16-24 who have a school certificate was 20%, which is the same as people in 35-50 and 50-75 age groups. By contrast, the age group over 75 years old had only 3% of the old who have a school certificate.
The figure for people from 50 to 75 years old who have no qualifications was 30%. In contrast, the age group 24-35 had only 9% of people who do not have any certificates which is the same amount as the 16-24 and 35-50 age groups. The percentage of individuals who have a university degree in two age groups (50-75 and 24-35) were 50% and 76% respectively. The amount of proportion of 35-50 years old in all three education levels was the same as people who are 16-24 years old in the year 2010.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-13 | Hatem Mohammed | 73 | view |
2021-09-29 | phg_phg | 55 | view |
2019-01-17 | ainhisandy | 87 | view |
2017-07-01 | vuhieuquy | 92 | view |
2014-11-24 | eddysuaib | 53 | view |
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 73
- The pie chart shows information about world resources and the bar chart shows the utilization of water in Egypt Saudi Arabia and Canada 73
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport However it is no longer the main form of transport What are the reasons What could be done to encourage the use of bicycles among the wider population 67
- we are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future is it good for us to reply so much on computers 89
- In many countries around the world life expectancy is increasing Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this situation and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 452, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...education levels was the same as people who are 16-24 years old in the year 2010.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 3.15609756098 507% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 293.0 196.424390244 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48805460751 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59048190738 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.382252559727 0.547539520022 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0369546278 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.545454545 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10685777285 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608603138214 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045610457909 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965316386637 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363598364574 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.