Some people say that at all levels of education, from primary school to university, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed that students from every level of education are wasting their time learning useless theory instead of spending them on practical experiences. I totally disagree with that because theories are the root of everything in the world as it is also too dangerous to practice what we do not know.
The theoretical background is expanding from small ideas and they have created the world we are living in now. They were suggested from human’s curiosity and base on them, we were able to build up every building, invention, and our lives. If we stop thinking of new ideas, our world will stand still through thousands of years with no development. As a result, if students spend less time learning facts, then they cannot brainstorm and become smarter, which is the most important thing humans need to do. In other words, learning theories is one of the main keys to developing our world.
On the other hand, our world contains many mysterious things, so it may cause harm if we do not spend time working on it. For instance, our lives used to be threatened by natural disasters because we knew nothing about them so we cannot make up any plan to prevent the damage. However, through years of learning about geography, science, we can forecast rains, tsunami, earthquakes accurately, … and make our lives safer. The major reason for our safety is because of learning facts, learning that the water level will rise up before a flood or strong wind is a signal of an upcoming storm,… Whatsoever, we must spend a huge amount of time to learn about the facts, or we may die because of our lack of knowledge.
In conclusion, learning facts and finding new theories is our duty. Therefore, students and teachers must stride a balance between studying theoretical knowledge and doing practical projects to bring back the best productivity of learning.
- In some countries parents expect children to spend a long time studying in and after school and have less free time Do you think it has positive or negative effects on children and the society that they live in 73
- Today TV channels provide man s sport shows more than women s sports shows why Should TC channel give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 61
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- THE INTERNET IS NOW USED ALL AROUND THE WORLD AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION HOWEVER ITS CONTENT IS OFTEN CONTROVERSIAL SO MANY PEOPLE THINK IT NEEDS TO BE CONTROLLED OTHERS BELIEVE THERE SHOULD BE NO INTERFERENCE WHATSOEVER DISCUSS BOTH VIE 73
- IN THE FUTURE ALL CARS BUSES AND TRUCKS WILL BE DRIVERLESS THE ONLY PEOPLE TRAVELLING INSIDE THESE VEHICLES WILL BE PASSENGERS DO YOU THINK THE ADVANTAGES OF DRIVERLESS VEHICLES OUTWEIGHT THE DISADVANTAGES 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 590, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...ng wind is a signal of an upcoming storm,… Whatsoever, we must spend a huge amount...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86163522013 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60752320176 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581761006289 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7863842943 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.923076923 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169643850128 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691635651484 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545419944329 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124783995551 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542917008258 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.