he graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the line graph reveals the average metric tonnes of carbon dioxide disposal, discharged by each resident in four particular nations: The United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal in a 40-year period, starting from 1967.
Overall, there was a clear growth in the amount of CO2 per person releasing in Italy and Portugal. However, the downward trend was examined in both The United Kingdom and Sweden’s figures.
In the first year of the survey, it is the United Kingdom that discharged most CO2, with a substantial starting point of approximately 11 tonnes. No matter how remarkably it dropped by more than 2 tonnes in 40 years later, The UK was also the one to emit the most. Besides, although Sweden's figure steeply climbed by a tonne from a considerable number of nearly 9 tonnes, drastically did it plunge to roughly 5.8 tonnes in 2007.
Meanwhile, after swiftly rising to 6 tonnes, the amount of released CO2 in Italy noticeably grew and then leveled off at 8 tonnes, which doubled its initial figure. On the other hand, at an ample of approximately 1 tonne, having tremendously soared by more than 4 tonnes, Portugal reached a plateau at nearly 5.8 tonnes of CO2 after a period of 40 years.
- Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Percentage of pupils who passed their final exams 1993 11
- The diagram below shows the different stages in the manufacturing and use of steel 100
- The best way to solve word s environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Percentage of pupils who passed their final exams 1993 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84688995215 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68602229706 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5028089001 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.625 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179147396917 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806741151034 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632630699933 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121966264242 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067930461949 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.