Internet users as percentage of population
The given line graph illustrates the proportion of population that used internet in three different nations from 1999 to 2009.
Overall, the statistics of three countries increased over the whole period in the graph. In addition, the percentage in Mexico was always lowest.
In 1999, the proportion of internet users in the USA started at the highest point at 25%, that of Canada was at 15%, higher than Mexico which was at 8%. From 1999 to 2001, there was a significant rise in the number of people who used internet in the USA and Canada to 40% and 35% respectively, followed by a slight growth in that of Mexico to roughly 14%.
By 2003, people who used internet in Canada reached a peak at 60%, higher than the USA Mexico at about 45% and 25% respectively. In the last year of the period, the Internet users in Canada went up dramatically to the top at appropximately 97%, higher than the USA which was at 80%, accouting for 17%. In addition, the data of Mexico was the lowest at 30%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-25 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | lynnnn | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | caychanhvang | 70 | view |
- the graph below show the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005 78
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 to 2030 73
- Internet users as percentage of population 61
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 62
- The graph below show the average onumber of UK communters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 to 2020 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5530726257 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59214265049 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497206703911 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9843725578 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178513580129 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767499781794 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541308127886 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108976212852 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330413520267 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.