The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The line graph illustrates how many times youngsters of Australia consumed three kinds of fast food such as pizza, fish and chips, handsuburgs in a year between 1975 and 2000.
Overall, the popularity of fish and chips reduced dramatically, and a number of handsburgs and pizza eaters went up over the given year's.
From the beginning of the period, the number of teenagers who consumed pizza and handbags was approximately five and ten respectively. For the following year's, the number of Randsburg eaters count escalated tremendously and reached over 80 in 1985 and peak of 100 at the end of the period. while pizza counts grow to 30 in 1985 and later there was a considerable growth among teenagers who eat pizza with just over 80 by 1995 and remained same up to the year 2000.
On the other hand, the number of youngsters who eats fish and chips was 100 in 1975 which has slight fluctuated over the years and declined to below 100 by 1985. For the consecutive years, there was a significant decrease in the count and hit a low of near 40 in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-07 | Taiwo Morounfolu | view | |
| 2022-08-07 | Taiwo Morounfolu | view | |
| 2021-11-27 | eyraen | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-23 | tuilananh | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | xxyyzz | 73 | view |
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Map of a City in 1950 67
- Some say that university students should pay the full cost of their studies because higher education only benefits the students and not the society To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Over polpulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems. Identify one otlr two serious ones and suggest ways that government and individual can tackle this problem. 84
- The diagram below show the changes that have taken place in west Park secondary school since it s construction in 1950 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...d peak of 100 at the end of the period. while pizza counts grow to 30 in 1985 and lat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63829787234 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64771825373 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.9515905811 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.571428571 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105886591519 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525310225807 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492047451012 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685204007519 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579330807556 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.